杨家骆先生及其文献学成就   总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1  

李歆 《图书情报工作》2006,50(2):17-20

介绍20世纪著名的文献学家杨家骆先生的生平经历，以其一最有代表性的著述入手分析，具体阐述他对文献学事业所做的巨大贡献，并着重论述他在图书分类学、目录学、编纂、校勘等方面取得的成就以及他在地方志和地方文献保存工作上的贡献。  相似文献   

浅议CALIS联合目录数据库书目质量控制   总被引：14，自引：0，他引：14  

戚文 《图书馆论坛》2004,24(1):97-99

文章分析了CALIS联合目录数据库书目质量控制的现状；数据库存在的书目数据质量问题，提出了进一步提高书目数据质量的建议。  相似文献   

基于书目关联数据的文献版本关系发现研究     

梁美宏  曾建勋 《图书情报工作》2016,60(9):123-130

[目的/意义]利用关联数据名称唯一性特点,对书目数据进行语义化关联组织,使不同图书馆资源通过文献版本关系发现实现语义聚集。[方法/过程]分析书目关系类型及文献不同版本的特点,提出文献不同版本类型对应的版本关系,然后采用属性值顺序匹配方法,经过同种文献确定、版本关系发现两个步骤发现文献之间的版本关系,并利用美国国会图书馆、德国国家图书馆相关数据以及维基关联数据进行实证研究。[结果/结论]构建基于关联数据、书目数据的文献版本关系发现方法,实现同种文献不同版本的语义关联,发现实证数据间的版本关系,并指出其应用方向。通过该方法可以提供基于关联数据的知识检索服务,满足用户阅读、科研需求。  相似文献   

基于专利耦合的 中国、美国、日本锂离子电池技术前沿及差距分析     

佟贺丰  傅俊英曹 燕 《中国科技资源导刊 (中国信息导报)》2016,(2):27-35

基于定量分析识别技术前沿并测度各国的技术差距具有重要的理论和现实意义。本研究初步探讨了基于专 利数据,利用文献计量学的引文耦合分析法,进行技术前沿的识别和技术差距粗略测度,并以锂离子电池为例进行实 证研究。研究结果表明,该方法所识别出来的中国、美国和日本在锂离子电池领域的技术前沿以及各国之间的技术差 距,与产业现状具有一定一致性,是一条可行的研究途径。  相似文献   

对参考文献中增刊著录的探讨     

吴静  张艳霞  任凤国 《北京工业职业技术学院学报》2020,(2):117-120

增刊是在正刊之外出版的连续出版物,但《信息与文献参考文献著录规则GB/T 7714—2015》对增刊著录格式没有明确规定。参考文献中增刊著录不规范的问题非常普遍,主要体现为增刊期号和页码的著录形式不同。分析其原因,主要体现为不同期刊和数据库对增刊期号和页码的标志不同。因此提出规范增刊著录的建议,使作者和编辑有例可循。  相似文献   

Sensitivity and precision of adverse effects search filters in MEDLINE and EMBASE: a case study of fractures with thiazolidinediones     

Golder S  Loke YK 《Health information and libraries journal》2012,29(1):28-38

Background: Search filters have been developed in MEDLINE and EMBASE to help overcome the challenges of searching electronic databases for information on adverse effects. However, little evaluation of their effectiveness has been carried out. Objectives: To measure the sensitivity and precision of available adverse effects search filters in MEDLINE and EMBASE. Methods: A case study systematic review of fracture related adverse effects associated with the use of thiazolidinediones was used. Twelve MEDLINE search strategies and three EMBASE search strategies were tested. Results: Nineteen relevant references from MEDLINE and 24 from EMBASE were included in the review. Four search filters in MEDLINE achieved high sensitivity (95 or 100%) with an improved level of precision from searches without any adverse effects filter. High precision in MEDLINE could also be achieved (up to 53%) using search filters that rely on Medical Subject Headings. No search filter in EMBASE achieved high precision (all were under 5%) and the highest sensitivity in EMBASE was 83%. Conclusions: Adverse effects search filters appear to be effective in MEDLINE for achieving either high sensitivity or high precision. Search filters in EMBASE, however, do not appear as effective, particularly in improving precision.  相似文献   

What's Theory Got to Do with It? Applying Educational Theory and Research to Revamp Freshman Library Workshops     

Marta Bladek  Karen Okamoto 《College & Undergraduate Libraries》2014,21(1):19-36

Although librarians’ increasingly important role as teachers is among the most significant shifts and trends that have been reshaping academic libraries over the past few decades, most academic librarians have not received formal training in pedagogy and teaching. The authors describe how becoming familiar with educational theory and research enabled them to revamp freshmen library workshops. They provide a theoretical overview and present practical classroom applications of learning styles theory, active learning techniques, learning by analogies, collaborative learning, and group work. Learning theories and educational research findings, the authors suggest, can be readily translated into practice and inform the teaching of information literacy to freshmen.  相似文献   

Reporting methodological search filter performance comparisons: a literature review     

Jennifer Harbour  Cynthia Fraser  Carol Lefebvre  Julie Glanville  Sophie Beale  Charles Boachie  Steven Duffy  Rachael McCool  Lynne Smith 《Health information and libraries journal》2014,31(3):176-194

  相似文献   

Cameos,supporting roles and stars: citation and reflection in the context of initial teacher education     

Jonathan Hughes 《Educational research; a review for teachers and all concerned with progress in education》2013,55(1):16-30

Background: Reflection is well established as an important part of teacher education, but it is also the focus of critical enquiry. This means that reflection is of interest to those who wish to explore its use to produce ‘better’ teachers. It is also of interest to scholars who are interested in the wider implications of reflection, for example, in relation to power and social control. Academic articles are the primary medium through which ideas and practices are communicated. However, they can only contribute if they are accepted for publication on the basis of making a contribution to knowledge. To be seen in this way, a journal paper needs to cite earlier work to show understanding of this work and how this is being augmented.

Purpose: This paper aims to initiate an academic debate of citation practices which, it argues, should be based on an awareness of current practices and a willingness to share, and even change, them. To facilitate the debate and the development of a better understanding of citing and its implications, the paper offers a tripartite citation framework.

Sources of evidence: The extensive citation analysis literature is reviewed to provide a context for an examination of the variety of citation practices found in 24 papers, which all focus on initial teacher education and which cite the same critical paper (Fendler, L., Teacher reflection in a hall of mirrors: Historical influences and political reverberations. Educational Researcher, 32, no. 3: 16–25, 2003; doi: 10.3102/0013189X032003016).

Main argument: This paper argues that there is value in differentiating three categories of citation, labelled ‘cameo’, ‘supporting role’ and ‘star’. These categories do not make judgements about what counts as ‘good’ or ‘bad’ referencing. Rather, they provide a way for authors to assess how they are citing and what the possible consequences may be. These can include an apparent lack of understanding not just of a cited paper but also of the wider literature. This means that citation that is not being carefully managed can undermine an argument.

Conclusions: This paper concludes that there is there is a need to initiate an academic debate about citation which is premised on the development of self-awareness about current practice and its consequences. Such a debate could bring about a number of benefits. It would encourage individual scholars to develop self-aware and ethical citation; it would also clarify current expectations about citation and enable academic communities to reflect on whether enquiry is well served by them.  相似文献   

Basic Serials Cataloging Workshop     

Les Hawkins  Hien Nguyen  Stephen Kharfen 《期刊图书馆员》2015,68(1-4):5-16

  相似文献